Research Threads

Show Which Evidence Actually Supports A Decision

The Decision Argument Surface centers one real decision, then places supporting evidence on the left and limits or counter-evidence on the right — weighting by sample size, comparability, and source completeness, not AI importance scores.

Research Thread · ST-TH-01
  • Research windowWave 3 → ST-WAVE-04
  • AudienceSelf-serve + Enterprise · US
  • WeightingSample · Comparability · Source completeness
Decision under evidence

Redesign Enterprise Onboarding

Should the onboarding flow be redesigned this quarter, or is the signal too thin to act on yet?

Supports
Satisfaction dipped for self-serve accounts

Wave 3–4 · ST-TH-01 · onboarding flagged as the top open-text theme for this cohort · n=214 comparable

Onboarding friction theme up 7 points

Wave 4 open-text · 22% of self-serve responses mention setup confusion · quotes linked

Support ticket volume up for new signups

Cited from CS system export · correlates with onboarding open-text theme · source complete

Against / Limits / Unconfirmed
Sample size for self-serve is small

68 respondents this wave — directional, not yet conclusive at this confidence level

Usability score held steady

3.8 to 3.9 across the same waves — friction may be pre-signup, not in-product

Enterprise segment still positive

Enterprise satisfaction held at 4.2 — redesign must not break that path

Questions still needing validation
  • Run a targeted Wave 5 pulse on self-serve onboarding within 2 weeks of signup
  • Add a branch question distinguishing setup friction from feature-discovery friction
  • Compare onboarding open-text theme against support ticket tags directly

Publish Research Thread freezes evidence, constraints, owners, and follow-ups into a shareable decision record — new waves attach instead of replacing it.